Organic Famers Association Presidential Forum with Bernie Sanders

Tune in to Organic Farmers Association hosting a Presidential Forum on the topic of Combating Climate Change with Organic and Regenerative Agriculture. Senator Sanders is fielding questions from Iowa organic farmers.


Organic Farmers Association Comments to the Select Committee on Climate Change


November 22, 2019

Congresswoman Kathy Castor
Chair
Select Committee on the Climate Crisis
H2-359 Ford Building
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Chairwoman Castor,

Organic Farmers Association (OFA) is responding to the Select Committee on Climate Crisis’ request seeking additional, detailed input from stakeholders in the agriculture sector on reducing carbon pollution, maximizing carbon storage, and suggestions on agriculture policies to adapt to the impacts of climate change.

Organic Farmers Association is a membership organization that represents America’s 19,500 certified organic farmers. While we have supporting and organizational members, only domestic certified organic farmers vote on OFA’s policies and leadership. The organization was founded by and is controlled by certified organic farmers nationwide.

Our members are concerned about climate change and have been documenting climate change on their farms for the past four decades through careful recording of slight changes in planting and harvest dates, frost dates, and rainfall and heat shifts. In the past few years, severe weather events have been a more forceful reminder that climate is changing, and we must make societal changes to achieve a better balance.

It is extremely important that as a nation we reduce or eliminate fossil fuels to reduce the major sources of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. At the same time, we must implement policies that encourage practices that sequester carbon to remove it from the atmosphere as well as practices that support healthy soil to hold water, preventing erosion and desertification.

The Rodale Institute last year released a Regenerative Organic Agriculture and Climate Change paper1 highlighting regenerative organic agriculture’s role in storing carbon in healthy soil. The report shows it is possible to sequester all the 52 gigatons of CO2 and CO2 equivalents emitted annually by switching to organic regenerative farming practices, which maximize carbon fixation while minimizing the loss of carbon returned to the soil.

Researchers comparing the carbon sequestration ability of certified organic soils and conventional soils have consistently shown that organic soils outperform conventional soils’ ability to sequester carbon.2 A meta-analysis of 20 organic/conventional comparison trials around the world, showed that organic systems accrued an average of 400 lb carbon per acre per year more than conventional systems.3 Another meta-analysis of 59 studies found total soil organic carbon (SOC) averaging 19 percent higher in organic than conventional systems.4 A 2019 comprehensive meta-analysis looked at 528 studies that had compared at least one organic farm to at least one conventional farm. 5 This meta-analysis found that on average, organic soils had a 10 percent higher organic carbon content than conventional soils and sequestered 230 more lbs per acre of carbon (256 kg C /hectare) each year than the conventional soils, and concluded that converting farmland from conventional to organic production would have “a cumulative climate protection performance... of 1,082 kg CO2 equivalents per hectare per year” equivalent to eliminating 963 lbs of CO2 emissions per year for each acre converted.6

In addition to carbon sequestration, certified organic farms use the sequestered carbon to build healthy soils, which are instrumental in productive hydrological cycles. In the U.S., a nationwide study that sampled 659 organic fields and 728 conventional fields showed 13 percent higher total soil organic matter (SOM) and 53 percent higher stable SOM in the organic soils.7 Organic soil management also shows additional climate benefits such as higher aggregate soil stability (15 percent higher) and
reduction of soil erosion and soil loss occurrences 22 percent and 26 percent lower, respectively.8 High SOM in healthy soil is essential for holding water, which helps reduce soil loss, erosion and prevents desertification. Soils with high SOM can hold water for longer, sustaining plants through a drought; thus, prolonging soil cover with photosynthesizing plant growth for a longer period. Increased photosynthesis sequesters carbon from the atmosphere into the plant to support plant growth. Increased plant cover also provides cooling benefits through transpiration, the evaporation of water from plant leaves. Expansive forests and grasslands create large amounts of transpiration that produce significant water vapor in the atmosphere, increasing precipitation and cloud cover, both offering beneficial climate cooling.

Moving more farms towards organic management is essential to our future. We must reverse climate change, and the USDA National Organic Program provides a ready-made solution with a market-based approach that can be implemented quickly and widely. The desired practices for reducing climate change, when done regeneratively using organic methods, also pay off financially for farmers, which encourages implementation.

Organic Farmers Association encourages policy makers to support agricultural production practices that are most effective at sequestering carbon, building soil organic matter, and improving soil biological activity, all important tools that also reduce soil erosion and soil loss.

We hope your report to be released in March 2020 recognizes that regenerative organic soils are an effective strategy for sequestering atmospheric carbon and a necessary part of the solution to reversing climate change. While we must work to reduce or eliminate harmful emissions into the atmosphere, an immediate available solution is sinking the carbon into the soil.

We encourage the Select Committee to take a comprehensive view of the policies our Organic Farmer Members have passed identifying a variety of strategies and policies from tax and farm policy to pricing of carbon, that will aid us in reversing climate change, although we recognize that the Farm Bill is the main agricultural policy driver in Congress.

Organic farmer members have identified the following policy suggestions that will help reduce climate change:

  • A national organic agriculture transition program
    This would entail a federal program with targets for involving a significant number of U.S. farms to transition significant domestic acreage to organic management. Starting with three years of financial incentives during the high-risk transition period, farmers would then need more market driven support in the form of a fair marketplace and access to federally subsidized insurance and incentive programs equal to that of non-organic farmers. National Organic Program’s accredited certification agencies’ annual certification inspections would ensure implementation of climate-beneficial practices. A federal program like this would also need to provide technical assistance funding to organic farm organizations to help farmers in transition as well as professional development training to NRCS and other USDA agencies to support farmers using existing programs for their transition. Organic Farmers Association farm members passed a policy position in the Spring of 2019 that supports organic transition incentive programs that provide financial and technical assistance to non-organic farmers to help them convert land to certified organic management systems.
  • Use of the USDA’s NRCS Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (ACEP) to incentivize organic/carbon farming
    Earmarking a certain percentage of the ACEP program for the preservation of certified organic farmland will incentivize carbon sequestration through organic production. NRCS uses ACEP to purchases easements on farms to prevent the ground from being developed. If there was a goal or earmark (much like the organic EQIP) to prioritize preservation of certified or transitional acreage, then the NRCS dollars that go towards preserving farmland will be preserving farmland that supports production known to sequester carbon.
  • Increased investment in the National Organic Program
    Organic regulations require certified organic farmers to implement beneficial carbon sequestration practices by eliminating chemical soil disturbance through the prohibition of synthetic fertilizers, herbicides, and other crop protection chemicals. The standards require organic farmers to adopt tillage and cultivation practices that “maintain or improve” soil condition. To ensure consistent and equitable implementation of the organic regulations here must be an increased investment in the National Organic Program to enable USDA to fulfill its role as accreditor of the standards ensuring accountability and enforcement of the regulations.

A fundamental principle at the foundation of organic farming, and underlying the recommendations listed above, is that organic management is a holistic production practice that aims to manage the farm as an ecological system. Thus, an organic farmer doesn’t merely focus on using best practices on a specific field, or on farming without chemicals, but must also consider soil health, crop diversification, crop rotation, fostering biodiversity in and around fields, and market diversification. A diverse ecological systems-approach is the organic farmer’s best insurance program because it not only builds carbon in soil and vegetation, but also builds resilience for the farm and its host ecosystem in the face of climate change and other disruptions. Organic Farmers Association believes it is time for our nation to take an analogous “whole-farm view” of our national agricultural system.

Unfortunately, nationwide U.S. agricultural lands host a greatly diminished diversity, with a handful of commodity crops dominating the landscape and economy of farming. Agriculture in our nation has not always been so ecologically unstable, but most of our agricultural policies have incentivized a disproportionate commitment to non-human-food crops that service feedlots, fructose and ethanol. As a result, pragmatic farmers who have simply been responding to the economic imperatives laid before them, are now vulnerable to the long-term systemic effects of fossil fuel-intensive, non-diversified farming, i.e., flooding and/or drought, soil loss and degradation, dependence on imported nitrogen fertilizers and expensive chemical inputs, limited markets, and poor diets. This puts our nation’s food security at risk, not to mention our long-term ecological stability.

Organic Farmers Association encourages the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis to proceed with a “whole-farm view” as you establish policy priorities for the carbon-sequestration potential discussed throughout this letter. This approach brings hope and practical solutions for climate stability. The organic farming community already demonstrates hopeful, diverse and feasible strategies for geographically specific mitigation of, and adaptation to climate change. Organic farming’s potential can be magnified with Congress’s help to update the Farm Bill considering climate change and evolving food systems.

Thank you for your dedicated work on this important issue. Our membership believes that organic agricultural systems provide an essential solution to reversing carbon change. With policies that encourage organic transition and the proper support to aid farmers to successfully transition to organic management, regenerative organic farmers will be effective at sinking large quantities of carbon, while simultaneously producing healthy food for the nation. Immediately removing carbon from the atmosphere through increased organic production will give policymakers time to implement additional policies to decarbonize our economy and improve the qualities of regenerative, organic soils.

Sincerely,

David Colson
President

 

  1. Rodale Institute, 2014. “Regenerative Organic Agriculture and Climate Change A Down-to-Earth Solution to Global Warming,“ Accessed November 12, 2019 at:https://rodaleinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/Regenerative-Organic-Agriculture-White-Paper-RodaleInstitute.pdf
  2. National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition. 2019. Agriculture and Climate Change: Policy Imperatives and Opportunities to Help Producers Meet the Challenge. Washington D.C.
  3. Gattinger, A., A. Muller, M. Haeni, C. Skinner, A. Fliessbach, N. Buchmann, P. Mader, M. Stolze, P. Smith, N. E. Scialabba, and U. Niggli. 2012. Enhanced topsoil carbon stocks under organic farming, PNAS, 109 (44) 18826-18231.
  4. Lori, M., S. Symnaczik, P. MaEder, G. De Deyn, A. Gattinger. 2017. Organic farming enhances soil microbial abundance and activity – A meta-analysis and meta-regression. PLOS ONE |
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180442 July 12, 2017, 25 pp.
  5. Sanders J and J. Hess (Eds), 2019. Leistungen des ökologischen Landbaus für Umwelt und Gesellschaft. Braunschweig: Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, 364 p, Thünen Report 65. Accessed May 2, 2019 at: https://www.thuenen.de/media/ publikationen/thuenen-report/Thuenen_Report_65.pdf
  6. Ibid, 186.
  7. Ghabbour, E. A., G. Davies, T. Misiewicz, R. A. Alami, E. M. Askounis, N. P. Cuozzo, A. J. Filice, J. M. Haskell, A. K. Moy, A. C. Roach, and J. Shade. 2017. National Comparison of the total and Sequestered Organic Matter Contents of Conventional and Organic Farm Soils. Advances in Agronomy, 146: 1-35.
  8. Ibid.

Letter to Secretary Perdue Concerning Origin of livestock

December 2, 2019
The Honorable Sonny Perdue
Secretary
U.S. Department of Agriculture
1400 Independence Avenue SW
Washington, D.C. 20250

Dear Secretary Perdue,

The undersigned organizations are unified in our support for the proposed Origin of Livestock Rule. Rulemaking is critical to bring consistent enforcement, maintain a level playing field to all organic dairy producers, and uphold strong organic integrity for all organic farmers. We urge you to quickly review submitted comments and move towards immediate implementation of the Rule.

The Origin of Livestock Rule is needed to uphold consumers’ expectations about organic dairy by specifying that organic dairy animals must be raised organically from the last third of gestation or be raised organically for one year if transitioning a conventional herd to organic, which is allowed only once. Once a distinct herd is transitioned to organic, all animals must be raised organically from the last third of gestation. It must be prohibited to cycle dairy animals in and out of organic production.

The delay in issuing a final Rule has resulted in economic harm for organic dairy farmers from low pay prices caused by an oversupply of organic milk enabled and encouraged by loopholes in the current rule. As you are aware, 99% of the original comments to the 2015 Origin of Livestock Rule supported making these same changes. We urge you to ensure the final rule reflects the much-needed clarity requested by the organic dairy producer community and upholds a strong sense of organic integrity.

Both the House and Senate responded to the requests of the organic industry by including bill language in the Fiscal Year 2020 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agency Appropriations Bill requiring USDA to issue a final Origin of Livestock rule within 180 days from the date of enactment. The current rule is inhibiting the National Organic Program’s ability to provide consistent and fair enforcement; leaving our nation’s organic animal standards unfair and inconsistent.

The strong public-private partnership between USDA and the organic industry has created a foundation that has allowed the industry to grow into a $50 billion market. This provides economic opportunities for U.S. farmers and businesses and produces one of the most highly trusted labels by consumers.

We respectfully ask you to move quickly to end the five-year wait for legal clarity and consistent implementation of origin of livestock regulations. Organic dairy farmers are suffering, and we have the solution to level the playing field and uphold consumers’ expectations with strong regulations. We know you share a desire for strong enforcement and integrity and trust you will act quickly to issue and implement a Final Rule.

Sincerely,

National Organic Coalition
Organic Farmers Association
Organic Trade Association
Accredited Certifiers Association, Inc.

Be A Blessing Farm
Beretta Dairy
Beyond Pesticides
California Cloverleaf Farms
CCOF
Center for Environmental Health
Cuatro Puertas
Dr. Bronner's
ETKO
FairShare CSA Coalition
Farm Aid
Food & Water Watch
Food Animal Concerns Trust (FACT)
Food Democracy Now!
FoodChain ID
Friends of the Earth
Hanover Co-op Food Stores
Hoosier Organic Marketing Education
IFOAM North America
Iowa Organic Association
Kanalani Ohana Farm
Lancaster Farm Fresh Co-op
LSAdderson, Inc.
Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association
McClelland's Dairy
Mensonides LLC Providence Farms
Midwest Organic and Sustainable Education Service (MOSES)
Midwest Organic Dairy Producers Alliance
MOFGA Certification Services, LLC
Montana Organic Association
MOSA Certified Organic
National Family Farm Coalition
National Farmers Organization
Natural Resources Defense Council
Nature's International Certification Services
New England Farmers Union
NOFA-NY Certified Organic LLC
Northeast Farming Association of New Jersey (NOFA-NJ)
Northeast Organic Dairy Farmers Alliance
Northeast Organic Farming Association - Interstate Council
Northeast Organic Farming Association of Connecticut
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York (NOFA-NY)
Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont
Northeast Organic Farming Association/Massachusetts Chapter (NOFA/Mass)
Northwest Center for Alternatives to Pesticides
OFARM Organic Farmers Agency for Relationship Marketing
Ohio Ecological Food and Farm Association
OneCert, Inc.

Oregon Tilth
Organic Crop Improvement Association Research & Education, Inc.
Organic Seed Alliance
Organic Seed Growers and Trade Assn (OSGATA)
OrganicEye
Pennsylvania Association for Sustainable Agriculture (PASA)
Pennsylvania Certified Organic (PCO)
Pesticide Action Network of North America
Primus Auditing Ops.
Quality Certification Services
Real Organic Project
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union
Rodale Institute
Sonoma County Department of Agriculture/Weights & Measures
Sonoma County Farm Bureau
Straus Family Creamery
Straus Organic Dairy Farm
The Cornucopia Institute
The Land Connection
Upstate Niagara Cooperative, Inc.
Vermont Organic Farmers (VOF)
Virginia Association for Biological Farming
Wesen Farms Inc
Western Organic Dairy Producers Alliance
Wild Farm Alliance


Comments Concerning Origin of Livestock Submitted to the NOP

December 2, 2019
Paul Lewis, Standards
Division, National Organic Program,
USDA-AMS-NOP,
1400 Independence Ave., SW,
Room 2642-So., Ag Stop 0268,
Washington, DC 20250-0268

Dear Mr. Lewis,

The Organic Farmers Association is writing to provide comments on docket number AMS-NOP-11-0009/ Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 0581-AD08. The Organic Farmers Association is providing comment now as the organization was created after the 2015 Origins of Livestock Rule comment period ended.

The mission of the Organic Farmers Association is to provide a strong and unified national voice for domestic certified organic producers. With the purpose to build and support a farmer led national organic farmer movement and national policy platform by: developing and advocating policies that benefit organic farmers; strengthening and supporting the capacity of organic farmers and farm organizations; and supporting collaboration and leadership among state, regional and national organic farmer organizations. We represent the 19,500 certified organic farmers and have organic farmer members in 48 of the 50 states.

The current Origin of Livestock rule is inhibiting the National Organic Program’s ability to provide consistent and fair enforcement; leaving our nation’s organic animal standards unfair and inconsistent. Our members have experienced the inequities created by the lack of clarity within the current rules outlining bovine dairy transition to organic dairy production. Our farmer members have ranked NOP enforcement and origin of livestock and pasture rule enforcement top policy priorities for in each of the two years we have administered a national organic farmer policy survey. We are encouraged that Congress has listened to its constituents, our membership and the organic farming community, to include language in the FY20 Agriculture Appropriations bill requiring USDA to implement the 2015 OOL Rule.

Organic Farmers Association supports an immediate issue of the Final Origin of Livestock Rule followed by immediate implementation and asks the USDA to include the following comments in the Final Rule:

  1. A producer as defined by USDA NOP may transition bovine dairy animals into organic production only once.
  2. A producer is eligible for this transition only if they convert an entire established non- organic dairy operation to organic production at the same geographic location within a defined 12-month period. Once that transition has started, other non-organically certified animals cannot be added to the herd.
  3. This transition must occur over a continuous 12-month period prior to production of milk or milk products that are to be sold, labeled, or represented as organic.
  4. A producer must not transition any new bovine dairy animals into organic production after the end of the 12-month transition period.
  5. A producer is not eligible for the exemption if it has been used by a Responsibly Connected person who has a 20% or more ownership share in their legal entity.
  6. The certifying entity will file an organic system plan prior to the start of transition and the transition process is overseen by the certifier as part of their accountability.
  7. Transitioned animals must not be sold, labeled, or represented as organic slaughter stock or organic bovine dairy animals.
  8. If organic management of the dairy animal, starting at the last third of gestation or at any other time it has been organic, is interrupted, the animal cannot be returned to organic
    certification.
  9. Split bovine conventional and organic milking herds at the same location are prohibited.
  10. Once the regulation is finalized all entities should be required to immediately meet the requirements of the Final Rule. There will be no implementation period.

The intent of the Organic Farmers Association position is to ensure that the transition exemption that allows for a conventional herd to be transitioned to organic production follows the intent of the original regulation and the subsequent recommendations of the National Organic Standards Board.

  • Organic Farmers Association’s position will stop continuous transition of conventional dairy livestock and stop the exemption from being used to combine multiple transitioned herds to
    form one operation. It will also stop first calf heifers and young cows being transitioned from conventional production and then being sold to an existing organic dairy, which is not in line
    with the rule and undermines certified organic dairies by providing a cheaper, quicker alternative to raising organic replacements under organic management.
  • Organic Farmers Association’s position will ensure that the whole transition happens over a twelve-month period and under the supervision of a certifier as part of the producer’s Organic System Plan. It will stop the practice of adding conventional animals and extending the transition period.
  • Organic Farmers Association’s position will stop the sale of transitioned animals (not raised in organic production from the last third of gestation) being sold as organic dairy animals that can be used to produce organic milk. It will not stop transitioned animals retaining their organic status if they are moved to a different location but under the same ownership. This does not affect the asset value of the animal as its initial value was as a conventional animal and any cost of transitioning the animal was reflected by the higher pay price. For family members who were part of the ownership of the transitioned entity who want to start their own operation, they will need to purchase organically certified animals under organic production from the last third of gestation as either young stock or milking animals. They would not be eligible to transition conventional animals. While this may seem unfair to new entrants or  complicate succession planning, strict clarity within this rule is required to end abuse that undermines the integrity of organic certification for all operations.
  • Organic Farmers Association’s position will stop the practice of having an organic and conventional dairy operation at the same location. While the practice of a split operation may
    be practical with other commodities, it is very difficult to audit and ensure that organic dairy product (raw milk) is not mixed with non-organic product. This will prevent any abuse or the
    perception of abuse.
  • Organic Farmers Association’s position supports economic equity for all organic dairy operations and ensures continued consumer confidence in the third-party certification process.
  • Organic Farmers Association’s position will increase the value of organically certified livestock (managed organically from the last third of gestation) which currently have no premium as most are sold on the conventional market. This will reflect the equity and sweat equity that organic producers have invested in their organic genetics and long-term commitment to organic
    integrity.

The implementation of these changes is needed to uphold consumers’ expectations about organic dairy by specifying that organic dairy animals must be raised organically from the last third of gestation or be raised organically for one year if transitioning a conventional herd to organic, which should be allowed only once. Once a distinct herd is transitioned to organic, all animals must be raised organically from last third of gestation. It must be prohibited to cycle dairy animals in and out of organic production.

Finalizing this rulemaking is critical to bring consistent enforcement which would create a level playing field among all organic dairy producers and uphold strong organic integrity for all organic farmers. Our members, efficient domestic organic dairy producers, believe they can compete with the most efficient organic dairy producers if they are treated equitably. Loopholes in the current rule put our members at a competitive disadvantage and allowed for an inequitable interpretation and enforcement of the rule by certifiers. The current transition system places the majority of organic dairy farmers, and particularly family-owned and operated dairy operations, at a significant competitive disadvantage. While we agree that market competition drives innovation, the current organic dairy farmers have not had fair competition due to lack of clarity in the rule and inequitable enforcement by the National Organic
Program.

The strong public-private partnership between USDA and the organic industry has created a foundation that has allowed the industry to surpass a $50 billion market. More importantly, maintaining and improving the integrity of the organic seal is a top priority for our members. The organic market provides economic opportunities for U.S. farmers and businesses and produces one of the most highly trusted labels by consumers.

As you are aware, 99% of the original comments to the FY15 Origin of Livestock Rule supported making these same changes. We urge you to ensure the final rule reflects the much-needed clarity requested by the organic dairy producer community and upholds a strong sense of organic integrity.

Sincerely,

David Colson
President


OFA Comments for the Select Committee on Climate Change

Organic Farmers Association (OFA) is responding to the Select Committee on Climate Crisis’ request seeking additional, detailed input from stakeholders in the agriculture sector on reducing carbon pollution, maximizing carbon storage, and suggestions on agriculture policies to adapt to the impacts of climate change.

OFA_ClimateChangeComments11.22.19


Immigration Reform Update

Immigration reform is moving in the House of Representatives. Catch OFA’s webinar with Dave Runsten, Community Alliance with Family Farmers (CAFF) on immigration reform, the current proposed bill, and OFA’s position on immigration at this link.

The House of Representatives’ Judiciary Committee scheduled a full committee vote for Wednesday, November 20 on Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren’s (D-CA) Farm Workforce Modernization Act, HR 4916. In her press release introducing the legislation, the Congresswoman said the proposal makes meaningful reforms to the H-2A agricultural guest worker program and creates a first-of-its-kind, merit-based visa program specifically designed for the nation’s agricultural sector.

Lofgren along with Dan Newhouse (R-WA), Collin Peterson (D-MN), Mike Simpson (R-ID), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), Doug LaMalfa (R-CA), and Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) are original sponsors of the bill.

While the legislation has 25 Republican co-sponsors, a party line vote is expected as the bill is passed out of the committee and sent to the floor for debate.

Judiciary Committee leadership is negotiating with Majority Leader Steny Hoyer for floor time the first week of December. Democratic leaders will be watching the November 20 markup to determine their floor strategy and schedule. A contentious markup could delay floor work as the December’s House floor schedule will be packed with other controversial issues.

During the last three weeks of the 2019 Congressional session, Congress will vote on immigration reform, funding the federal government for FY20 and an impeachment vote. The current Continuous Resolution (CR) funding the federal government expires on November 22. Congress is expected to pass a short-term CR until December 20.

Judiciary Committee staff suspects they could get 40 out of the 197 House Republicans to vote for immigration reform for the agriculture industry during floor debate, which would allow the proposal to be sent to the Senate.

The Senate schedule is much more complicated. The end of year work by the House will send both the immigration reform proposal and, as expected, impeachment to the Senate.

The impeachment trial by the Senate will consume almost all the attention. While the Majority and Minority need to come to an agreement on how the process will operate in the Senate, past impeachment precedent had the Senate working six days a week until the trial. That timeline would delay Senate action on the Farm Workforce Modernization Act until March.


USDA responds to our letter concerning the comment of Under Secretary Greg Ibach

Read the USDA's response to our Sign-on letter to Secretary Perdue concerning the comment of Under Secretary Greg Ibach

Read here


OFA-NOSB Oral Comments - Fall 2019

October 23, 2019

RE: General Comments to the NOSB

Thank you, members of the National Organic Standards Board for the opportunity to speak before you today. My name is Kate Mendenhall, I am the director of the Organic Farmers Association and I am also an Iowa organic farmer. OFA is led and controlled by domestic certified organic farmers and only certified organic farmers determine our policies using a grassroots process. We believe organic farmers were instrumental in creating our successful organic market and must be leaders in directing its future.

Organic Farmers Association greatly supports the work of the NOSB and finds your role crucial to maintain integrity in the USDA organic label. We also support NOSB recommendations moving forward to rulemaking or guidance in a timely manner.

We appreciate the NOSB’s 2018 resolution to move Origin of Livestock standards quickly to a final rule, and the USDA’s recent decision to not issue a second rule. We are concerned that the number of comments coming in might delay the process and we ask that the USDA work to move to an immediate implementation of a Final Rule. We are also hearing from farmers they still see a lack of oversight on pasture rule compliance. We appreciate the increased dairy oversight effort and we need to see more.

Last month we sent a letter to the Secretary of Agriculture in response to Undersecretary Ibach’s July statement expressing interest in a dialogue about gene-editing in organic. 78 organic organizations joined OFA to clearly communicate our unified opposition. We thank Dr. Tucker for confirming that gene editing has always been prohibited in organic agriculture. The organic community is NOT interested in a dialogue about gene editing. We do encourage robust dialogue about the numerous critical issues organic farmers are facing—protecting farmers from genetic and pesticide contamination, protecting farmers from import fraud, etc.

Organic Farmers Association continues to oppose the certification of hydroponic operations, a position passed by 90% of our certified organic farmer members nationwide and in each of our six geographic regions. We are concerned about the consequences to the integrity of the organic label as a result of the USDA and NOSB moving forward to allow for organic hydroponics without clarity on how it complies with OFPA and standards for this type of production system. At the spring NOSB meeting there was much conversation regarding whether container farms needed to comply with the same three-year transition as soil-based farms. Organic Farmers Association was pleased to receive NOP clarification for certifiers on transition time for container systems after the application of a prohibited substance; however, it left some ambiguity about how greenhouse production fits in. Is a three-year transition needed for a container system inside a greenhouse after application of a prohibited substance? It is important that the organic standards are clear and equitable across growing systems so that certifiers are implementing and enforcing the standards uniformly—if ambiguity is present, the NOP must provide clarity.

 

 


Action Alert: Tell USDA to Finalize Origin of Livestock Rule

Tell USDA to Finalize the 2015 Origin of Livestock Rule to

Close Organic Dairy Loopholes and Maintain High Organic Integrity

Organic Farmers Association is asking all certified organic farmers to stand with U.S. certified organic dairy farmers and submit comments to the USDA in support of a strong final Origin of Livestock Rule (OOL). Not only is this important to dairy farmers—it is important to all organic farmers that rely on a strong organic label that maintains consumer trust.

Family organic dairy farmers across the country have suffered greatly over the past few years, partially because the USDA has failed to close regulatory loopholes that have allowed mega-dairies to skirt the rules (by continually transitioning conventional dairy animals) and have flooded the milk market causing lower prices to farmers. Consumers have caught wind of these mega dairies and have questioned the integrity of the organic label. We cannot let that happen! We must fight for strong standards.

USDA opened the rule for comment on October 1. All comments are due to USDA by December 2.

Please tell USDA that you support the proposed OOL rule.

Individual comments to the USDA are best. If you submit a form comment, they will count all carbon copies as one comment. Please take 5 minutes to support organic dairies with a comment using the below template.

OOL Comment Template

INTRO: A short introductory paragraph about you and your farm. What do you grow, how long have you been certified, why organic integrity (strong standards) are important to you.

SUPPORT FOR THE RULE: A statement that clearly puts forward your support for the OOL final rule. You can use the below talking points:

  • I strongly support the proposed rule on Origin of Livestock Rule and its immediate implementation.
  • The OOL rule is needed to uphold consumers’ expectations about organic dairy by specifying that organic dairy animals must be raised organically from the last third of gestation or be raised organically for one year if transitioning a conventional herd to organic, which is allowed only once.
  • Once a distinct herd is transitioned to organic, all animals must be raised organically from last third of gestation
  • Cycling of dairy animals in and out of organic production is prohibited.
  • USDA should honor farmer-comments and strengthen, not weaken, the proposed rule.
  • The delay in issuing a final rule has resulted in economic harm for organic dairy farmers from low pay prices caused by an oversupply of organic enabled and encouraged by loopholes in the rule.
  • Rulemaking is critical to bring consistent enforcement, maintain a level playing field to all organic dairy producers, and uphold strong organic integrity for all organic farmers.

CLOSING: A closing statement that reaffirms your support for the 2015 proposed Origin of Livestock Rule and asks for immediate or swift implementation.

Thank you!

Background Information

The organic community has been working with USDA to improve the standards and transparency for transitioning dairy animals to organic milk production since 2013. In 2015, USDA released a proposed rule seeking comments from the dairy industry on improving those standards. 1570 comments were received by USDA at that time, and almost all (99%) supported the regulation that would limit herd transition to a one-time event.

The Organic Farmers Association has advocated for strong Origin of Livestock standards in our discussions with Congress and has asked USDA for consistency in applying OOL standards. This summer, we worked with Congress to include language in the FY20 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies Appropriations bill telling USDA to implement the FY15 Origins of Livestock final rule in 180 days. In the Spring of 2019, Organic Farmers Association Farmer-Members passed this policy:

OFA SUPPORTS an immediate implementation of the Final Origin of Livestock Rule and asks the USDA to prioritize the following prior submitted comments in the writing of the Final Rule:

  1. A producer as defined by USDA NOP may transition bovine dairy animals into organic production only once.
  2. A producer is eligible for this transition only if they convert an entire established non-organic dairy operation to organic production at the same geographic location within a defined 12-month period. Once that transition has started, other non-organically certified animals cannot be added to the herd.
  3. This transition must occur over a continuous 12-month period prior to production of milk or milk products that are to be sold, labeled, or represented as organic.
  4. A producer must not transition any new bovine dairy animals into organic production after the end of the 12-month transition period.
  5. A producer is not eligible for the exemption if it has been used by a Responsibly Connected person who has a 20% or more ownership share in their legal entity.
  6. The certifying entity will file an organic system plan prior to the start of transition and the transition process is overseen by the certifier as part of their accountability.
  7. Transitioned animals must not be sold, labeled, or represented as organic slaughter stock or organic bovine dairy animals.
  8. If organic management of the dairy animal, starting at the last third of gestation or at any other time it has been organic, is interrupted, the animal cannot be returned to organic certification.
  9. Split bovine conventional and organic milking herds at the same location are prohibited.
  10. Once the regulation is finalized all entities will be required to immediately meet the requirements of the Final Rule. There will be no implementation period.

Additional Resources


USDA Re-Opens FY15 Origin of Organic Livestock (OOL) comment period

An update on Origin of Livestock Rule by Mark Rokala, Policy Director.

On October 1, USDA re-opened the comment period on the FY15 Origins of Organic Livestock (OOL) Rule for 60 days—closing on December 2, 2019.

Both the House and the Senate, at Organic Farmers Association’s request, included legal language in their respective FY20 Agriculture Appropriations bills telling USDA to implement the FY15 OOL Rule in 180 days.

Because of that action by Congress, USDA’s Legal Counsel determined that the federal agency might be vulnerable to a lawsuit by a new entrant, since 2015, in the organic dairy industry. The Administrative Procedures Act requires those impacted by a policy change the opportunity to comment on its impact on their business.

In its official notification, USDA said that it would be adding new comments to the comments submitted in 2015.

The USDA will be including all prior 2015 comments in its review, as well as any new comments that come in before December 2, 2019.  Organic Farmers Association was not an organization in 2015, and thus we will submit comments to the rule.  We encourage all certified organic farmers to submit comments in favor of a strong Origin of Organic Livestock rule that clarifies that the animal transition for an organic dairy farm is a one-time whole-herd transition in support of organic dairy farmers nationwide.  This is an important organic integrity issue where we must stand in solidarity.  Organic Farmers Association sent out an action alert to aid in your comment submission. View Action Alert here.